After all that discussion, why does Builder actually hope for Deep Bear's arrival?

After chatting with some builders, I was surprised to find that they weren't pessimistic about the arrival of the bear market; on the contrary, they hoped the "deep bear" would last longer. Why? I tried to figure out their psychology: 1) From the inscription "pseudo-innovation" craze in 2023, to the BTC layer 2 narrative where Eastern and Western VCs refused to invest, to the AI ​​Agent MEME asset issuance narrative on Solana, and then to the series of artificially created domestic bull markets sparked by BN, the entire bull market was fragmented into short-lived attention-grabbing moments: lively but brief, followed by a mess.
It can be argued that a "real bull" has never existed, or that a "fake bull" has never left. However, the "super bull" events that everyone was once familiar with, such as DeFi Summer and NFT's breakthrough, which could drive incremental growth outside the market through on-exchange innovation, have become unattainable.
2) What makes Builders most desperate is that, after the voices promoting MEME Super Cycle became dominant, the MEME culture has evolved into a "narrative black hole," frantically devouring the entire market's attention to "technological innovation."
Imagine, when PumpFun generates tens of thousands of MEME coins every day, and a single MEME project can easily reach a market capitalization of 100M or even 2B, everyone is used to the thrill of zero-sum PVP games and has no patience to understand what a decentralized Sequencer, an Intent execution network, or a ZK Coprocessor are. This has caused many long-term builders to completely lose their "presence"; 3) Even more critically, due to the short exit window with ample liquidity, projects with solid builds are delayed due to predetermined plans such as roadmaps and tokenomics design, while some VC-backed projects designed specifically for narratives or self-created ecosystem projects within exchanges will try every means to absorb the liquidity that originally belonged to "value projects." By the time the real narrative projects are built, the market liquidity has dried up, TGE immediately falls below the issue price, and they have no choice but to simply give up, revealing investors' market manipulation and insider trading teams, bearing all the infamy, and exiting in the most undignified way. It should be noted that without the right timing and conditions of ample liquidity, the probability of a pump and dump being justified is one in ten thousand; 4) The key is that true technological innovation requires a long period of verification to implement PMF, but the changed market environment is not conducive to innovation. A very real problem: a project, from tackling technical challenges to product refinement and ecosystem implementation, normally takes at least 2-3 years, or even longer, to truly establish a brand barrier. But in the new environment, with only a 3-month window, everyone is scrambling to boost TVL (Total Value Link), generate buzz, and achieve TGE (Total Productivity). Who has the patience to let a project slowly validate PMF (Productivity, Favorability, and Composition)? Therefore, the market has inevitably fallen into an absurd cycle: true innovation takes time, but the market doesn't give it time; those who adhere to long-termism are eliminated, while those who take shortcuts cash out and leave. In conclusion, what they truly desire is not a powerless "deep bear market," but rather the complete removal of those "noise bulls" that hinder genuine innovation.