Discussions surrounding Bitcoin Improvement Proposal BIP-110 continue to heat up. Bitcoin pioneer and Blockstream co-founder Adam Back retweeted that while the proposal is described as a temporary soft fork to clean up on-chain "garbage data" and curb on-chain data bloat caused by protocols like Ordinals, its design may hinder Bitcoin's future upgrade capabilities. This is because the proposal disables the OP_SUCCESS opcode in Tapscript, which is considered a crucial reserved mechanism for future Bitcoin soft fork upgrades. Furthermore, BIP-110 limits the Taproot control block size to 257 bytes, potentially impacting the development of potential Layer 2 technologies like BitVM that rely heavily on script execution. Although BIP-110 is positioned as a "temporary measure," Bitcoin soft fork upgrades typically require a multi-year coordination period, and restricting the upgrade interface during this time could have long-term consequences.