SEC Division of Trading and Markets Director Jamie Selway said SEC Chair Paul Atkins has instructed the division to advance the development of a framework for the listing and trading of tokenized securities. According to ChainCatcher, Selway made the remarks at the Piper Sandler Global Exchange and FinTech Conference, adding that the guiding principle is to support innovation without creating regulatory arbitrage.

Securitize said the U.S. Securities and Exchange Commission declared effective its Form S-4 registration statement for the company’s planned merger with a special purpose acquisition company. According to NS3.AI, a special shareholders’ meeting to approve the merger is scheduled for June 29. If shareholders approve the deal, Securitize Corp. is expected to trade on the New York Stock Exchange under the ticker SECZ.

S&P Dow Jones Indices has delivered a surprise ruling: SpaceX will not be fast-tracked into the S&P 500, and the index's eligibility criteria are not changing. Despite Nasdaq, FTSE Russell, and Morningstar CRSP all rewriting their rule books to accommodate the incoming wave of mega-IPOs, S&P Dow Jones has declined to follow — leaving the world's most influential equity index operating under the same standards it always has. What S&P Dow Jones decided Following its consultation on the treatment of MegaCap companies, S&P Dow Jones Indices stated: "No changes will be made to the eligibility criteria including financial viability screens, seasoning period, or minimum IWF, for the S&P 500, S&P MidCap 400, or S&P SmallCap 600 as a result of the S&P Dow Jones Indices consultation on the treatment of MegaCap companies. Accordingly, there will be no changes to existing methodology for this index family." Three existing rules keep SpaceX out for the foreseeable future. The seasoning requirement demands 12 months of trading before a company can even be considered for inclusion — meaning SpaceX cannot join the S&P 500 for at least a year after its IPO regardless of any other factor. The investable weight factor requires that at least 10% of total shares outstanding be freely available for trading — a threshold that may be difficult to meet given the concentrated ownership structure typical of founder-led companies. And the financial viability screen requires four consecutive quarters of positive net income from continuing operations — a bar that SpaceX, depending on how its financials are structured across its various business lines, may or may not clear easily. Every other major index provider took the opposite approach The contrast with other index providers makes S&P's decision more striking. The consultation had been widely expected to result in rule changes after Nasdaq, FTSE Russell, and Morningstar CRSP all moved to accommodate mega-IPOs ahead of the S&P ruling. MSCI and FTSE Global already had fast-tracking mechanisms for mega-IPOs using free-float weights after 10 and 5 trading days respectively — frameworks built precisely for situations like SpaceX. FTSE Russell updated its Russell indices methodology to align with the FTSE Global rule book. Morningstar CRSP dropped its minimum free-float requirement entirely to admit SpaceX and comparable floaters after only five days of trading. Nasdaq cleared a path for fast-track inclusion at a three-times weight after just 15 days. S&P Dow Jones stood alone in refusing to move — a decision that carries significant implications given that the S&P 500 is the benchmark for an estimated $10 trillion or more in indexed and benchmarked assets globally. What this means for SpaceX and markets For SpaceX, the immediate practical consequence is that the enormous passive buying pressure that typically accompanies S&P 500 inclusion — index funds mechanically purchasing shares to match the benchmark weight — will not materialize at IPO or in the months immediately following it. That removes one of the most reliable catalysts for post-IPO price appreciation that mega-cap technology companies have historically benefited from. The longer timeline also introduces more uncertainty. SpaceX must trade publicly for 12 months, demonstrate sufficient free-float, and generate four consecutive quarters of positive net income before the S&P Index Committee will even consider inclusion. For a company whose business spans satellite internet, rocket launches, defense contracts, and the newly merged xAI artificial intelligence operations, the income calculation is complex. The deeper question: is passive the new active? S&P's decision raises a question that goes beyond SpaceX. As the largest index providers diverge sharply on how they handle mega-cap IPOs — with some fast-tracking after five days and others maintaining 12-month seasoning requirements — the composition of indices that were supposed to represent passive, rules-based market exposure is increasingly reflecting active judgment calls about which companies to include and when. When CRSP drops its free-float minimum and Nasdaq creates a three-times weight fast-track specifically to capture one company, the boundary between passive indexing and active curation becomes difficult to locate. S&P's refusal to follow suggests at least one major provider believes that boundary matters — and that the integrity of a consistent, rules-based methodology is worth more than the commercial pressure to accommodate the market's biggest new listings. Whether that judgment proves correct will depend on how much benchmarked capital flows toward the indices that include SpaceX quickly versus those that do not — and whether the resulting performance divergence creates enough pressure to force S&P's hand at a future review, according to Financial Times.

U.S. Energy Secretary Wright said the United States will replenish the Strategic Petroleum Reserve with 40 million barrels of crude oil after the Iran conflict ends. According to Odaily, Wright made the remarks in comments reported by Fox News.

Visa is testing whether privacy-enabled blockchain networks can support institutional stablecoin settlement without exposing sensitive transaction data, using a proof of concept with stablecoin infrastructure company Brale and the Canton Network. According to Cointelegraph, the project was announced Thursday and uses SBC, a US dollar-backed stablecoin issued by Brale, to simulate institutional payment flows on Canton as Visa evaluates whether SBC could become another stablecoin option in its settlement program. The initiative builds on Visa’s earlier stablecoin settlement experiments on public blockchains, which began in 2021 with USDC settlement on Ethereum, but shifts focus to banks and market infrastructure providers seeking onchain efficiency without revealing counterparties, positions, or flows on a public ledger. Canton, developed by Digital Asset, connects permissioned blockchain applications operated by institutions including JPMorgan, Goldman Sachs, BNP Paribas, and the Depository Trust & Clearing Corporation. Unlike public chains, Canton is designed so that only transaction participants and authorized regulators can view specific deal data, while still enabling atomic settlement across tokenized assets, cash-like instruments, and other financial contracts. Visa and Brale said the proof of concept will assess how Canton’s privacy architecture could support faster and more programmable settlement while allowing financial institutions and payment companies to maintain strict control over the visibility of sensitive transaction and settlement information. The test comes as policymakers and analysts anticipate a broader shift in how payment stablecoins are used. S&P Global Ratings said in a Thursday report that global stablecoin issuance has already surpassed $300 billion across currencies, with most demand still tied to crypto trading. The report added that US payment stablecoins that comply with the Guiding and Establishing National Innovation in US Stablecoins (GENIUS) Act are poised to expand into merchant remittances and certain types of commercial payments once rules are finalized, with cross-border payments cited as a promising near-term use case. However, it noted that such flows currently represent only a minimal, if growing, share of global international payment volumes. S&P Global also said stablecoins could threaten a portion of banks’ payments income and shift funding from insured retail deposits toward more concentrated wholesale balances, while banks that issue stablecoins or tokenized deposits themselves may capture new fee and funding opportunities. Cointelegraph reported it contacted Visa, Brale, and Digital Asset but had not received a response by publication.

Federal Reserve official Beth Hammack said a near-term interest rate hike may be appropriate if recent trends continue. According to NS3.AI, Hammack said the labor market appears roughly balanced and that the unemployment rate remains at 4.3%. Hammack also said it is reasonable to keep interest rates steady for now because the economic outlook remains uncertain.

A total of 343,075 ETH across DeFi protocols is at risk of liquidation, with the positions valued at $547 million, according to monitoring data. According to NS3.AI, the largest concentration of liquidation risk is tied to 137,908 ETH at a price level of $1,361.73. The figures indicate a sizable cluster of leveraged DeFi exposure that could be forced to unwind if ETH trades around the identified threshold.

截至2026年6月3日，微策略（Strategy/MSTR）持有843,706枚比特币（市值约531 亿美元），同时背负67亿美元可转债和155亿美元永续优先股，年化付息义务约17.12亿美元。

金色财经推出《金色Web3.0日报》，为您提供最新、最快的AI、DeFi、DAO、NFT和元宇宙行业新闻。

人工智能,AI正在主导人民币走势 金色财经,今年，人民币持续升值，走势颇为“反常”。

稳定币,支付,全球首张“付息稳定币”牌照落地 不是美国、不是欧盟 是巴林 金色财经,全球稳定币监管正在走向分裂。

美股,稳定币,稳定币买美股 正在打开一条危险的地下高速路 金色财经,这两天的几条新闻，单独看都不小。

Zcash(隐私版比特币）一个存在四年的加密造假漏洞，人工审计一直没找到。而一个才发布一天的AI一天就找到了。

加密支付项目真正的竞争力，不是谁先拿到一个便宜牌照，而是谁先把牌照、银行、通道、链上风控、客户准入、合同责任和运营纪律拼成一套可以长期运转的系统。

华尔街,SpaceX,有了路演数据 华尔街现在怎么看 SpaceX 金色财经,华尔街给的四个价格锚。

SpaceX 在路演中把自己定义为“唯一一家同时建设太空、连接和 AI 三大基础设施的公司”。

BTC,加密货币,机构大幅割肉 BTC跌破200周均线 金色财经,BTC继续跌跌不休，再度冲击61k的城门。