Web3 is not a trend, but a class.Many people believe that Web3 is the future trend, but when you ask them why it is a trend, they can't give a clear answer. They may have just heard others say it's a trend, and they probably think so themselves.But in my opinion, it's a class, like the emerging bourgeoisie in Britain back then.Because in the current era, anyone with a certain level of wealth will pay attention to this field. This is not a trend or a track, but a required course. The reason is simple: when your assets reach a certain level, your funds will drive you to seek safer and more convenient ways to liquidate them. This is also why 35% of Asian family offices allocate funds to cryptocurrencies. They cannot ignore a continuously growing market; it's driven by capital. The new rich in the crypto world naturally understand the value and intricacies of Web3, after all, that's where they started their fortunes. Some might say, "That's not right. The people I know in the Web3 industry are all like losers, constantly shouting that something big is coming, or they're just crazy about cryptocurrency trading." First, we acknowledge that this situation is widespread, just like a coin has at least two sides. Web3 has a strong wealth-creating effect, but that doesn't mean everyone who enters will make money. In any secondary market, there are more people losing money than making money; the Pareto principle (80/20 rule) always applies. And more importantly, most cryptocurrency traders don't actually have much money, and those who do don't spend too much time trading cryptocurrencies. Everyone has their own things to do and no one has time to whine online about how much money they've lost. It's like a forest; there are lions and tigers, foxes and raccoons, squirrels and sheep—everyone is part of the ecosystem. Even within the same social class, there are distinctions of rank; that's just how it is. Recently, I wrote several articles about legislation, and some people said I was just releasing negative news to scare investors, but they didn't notice the key question I left: After legislation, will you still dare to trade cryptocurrencies? The point isn't whether or not there's legislation, but whether you dare. Frankly, this was an article I specifically wrote to test my followers' faith; I wanted to see if you could truly remain steadfast under pressure. And indeed, a group of dissidents couldn't resist jumping out. Perfect, I'll block and take you all away. I don't need followers who have no faith in the industry and are just mingling in the crowd. So you can still unfollow me now. Legislation targets criminal activity, not ordinary people. Individual holding and trading of cryptocurrency does not constitute a violation of the law; this is already a definitive framework. If, under this premise, you are still affected by various news, it means you are not so resolute; many people are just talking the talk of being a hodler. Not everyone needs opportunities, just as not everyone wants to get rich. But that's not important; the times will always reward the brave. The key question is, are you truly brave enough?