Crypto News: Crypto Treasury Inflows Crash 95% in May to Lowest Level Since 2024 — The Raise-and-Hold Era Is Over

Monthly inflows into digital asset treasury companies collapsed to $180 million in May — down 95% from April's $4.4 billion and approximately 93% below the January-through-May monthly average — according to DefiLlama data. The figure is the lowest since October 2024 and marks a dramatic reversal from two consecutive months of $4 billion-plus inflows that had made corporate crypto treasury accumulation one of the most talked-about institutional trends of the cycle.Bitcoin treasury companies accounted for nearly all of May's total at $177 million — roughly 98% of the monthly figure — but even Bitcoin-specific inflows were down sharply from the $3.8 billion recorded in April. Non-Bitcoin treasury contributions were marginal, with smaller inflows from ZCash, Story, and Sui, while Litecoin recorded a $1.89 million outflow.What the collapse in inflows signalsThe 95% month-over-month decline is not simply a reflection of crypto's broader price weakness in May — though Bitcoin's retreat from $83,000 to below $72,000 clearly dampened enthusiasm. The deeper signal is structural. The conditions that made corporate crypto treasury accumulation an attractive capital formation strategy in 2024 and early 2025 — premium-to-NAV valuations, easy equity issuance, limited competition from regulated investment vehicles, and a narrative of institutional Bitcoin adoption still in its early stages — have all deteriorated simultaneously.Bitcoin spot ETFs now provide institutional investors with low-cost, liquid, regulated exposure to Bitcoin without the corporate overhead, equity dilution, operating costs, and balance sheet volatility that come with investing in a treasury company. That structural competition has compressed the premium that treasury firms can charge above their net asset value — and without a meaningful premium, the equity issuance engine that powered aggressive accumulation strategies stalls.Galaxy Digital: the raise-and-hold era is overGalaxy Digital has been explicit about what this inflection point means. The firm argued in a recent report that digital asset treasury companies can no longer sustain a business model built on simply raising capital and holding tokens. The next phase, Galaxy argued, requires treasury firms to put assets to work — through staking, validator infrastructure, DeFi strategies, or other active treasury management approaches that generate yield rather than relying purely on passive price appreciation.The data is supporting that thesis. Everstake reported on May 26 that staking accounted for an average of 60% of reported revenue among six Ethereum treasury firms that disclosed staking-related income — a figure that illustrates how rapidly the revenue model for treasury companies is shifting from capital gains to programmatic cash flow.ETFs set a permanent ceiling on treasury premiumsArthur Firstov, chief business officer at payments infrastructure firm Mercuryo, cautioned against blaming ETFs alone for the repricing of treasury firms — but acknowledged that their structural impact is real and permanent. "ETFs do impose a structural constraint that didn't exist before," he said. "They set a permanent ceiling on what premium treasury firms can charge. Every quarter now requires fresh justification for that markup."Firstov identified the full range of company-specific factors that weigh on treasury firm valuations: equity dilution from continuous share issuance to fund purchases, operating costs that do not exist in an ETF wrapper, balance sheet losses during drawdowns, and broader risk sentiment that punishes leveraged business models during risk-off periods. All of these factors have been present in May — Strategy fell 8.2% on the day it disclosed its first Bitcoin sale, and smaller treasury companies including Nakamoto have lost 67% year-to-date.For Ethereum and proof-of-stake asset treasury firms specifically, Firstov noted that staking can improve capital efficiency by creating programmatic cash flow — but it cannot fix weak corporate structures. "Companies with high operating costs or continuous dilution cannot math their way out with a 3% to 5% staking yield," he said.The broader implicationsThe collapse in DAT inflows is the corporate sector's contribution to the same institutional retreat visible in Bitcoin ETF outflows. May has been defined by a simultaneous withdrawal of institutional capital through multiple channels: $2.97 billion out of Bitcoin ETFs in 10 consecutive days, $2.6 billion out of Ethereum ETFs in 14 consecutive sessions, a 95% collapse in corporate treasury inflows, and whale distribution signals from CryptoQuant showing the fastest negative balance growth among large holders this year.The convergence of these outflow signals across multiple institutional channels — ETFs, corporate treasuries, and on-chain whale behavior — creates a more challenging recovery environment than any single channel in isolation would suggest. Recovery requires not just one source of institutional demand to reverse but several simultaneously.The transition from raise-and-hold to active yield generation that Galaxy and Everstake are describing may ultimately create more durable treasury models — but the transition period, where old models are being repriced and new ones are not yet proven, is precisely the kind of structural uncertainty that keeps institutional capital on the sidelines.