Log in/ Sign up

About 1ART

OneArt ecosystem is a scalable and easy-to-use NFT&MetaVerse infrastructure to let industries use the full potential of advanced NFT technologies.The custom features developed by OneArt are intended to optimize the blockchain’s utility specifically for use in e-commerce.To achieve the goals set, the OneArt team has already created a suite of blockchain-based tools:Mobile Wallet AppWeb3 Wallet1ART Multichain BridgeDeFi ToolsBrand-new MetaLaunchAll these things make the OneArt ecosystem the ideal place for newcomers, experienced users, and geeks in the sphere of NFT&MetaVerse.

OneArt (1ART) is a cryptocurrency launched in 2021. 1ART has a current supply of 465.83M with 143.42M in circulation. The last known price of 1ART is 0.000252684718 USD and is 0.000003600015 over the last 24 hours. It is currently trading on active market(s) with $0 traded over the last 24 hours. More information can be found at https://oneart.digital.

Official Website

Social Media

1ART Price Statistics
1ART’s Price Today
24h Price Change
+$0.0000036000151.45%
24h Volume
$00.00%
24h Low / 24h High
$0 / $0
Volume / Market Cap
--
Market Dominance
0.00%
Market Rank
#3494
1ART Market Cap
Market Cap
$36,239.04
Fully Diluted Market Cap
$252,684.72
1ART Price History
7d Low / 7d High
$0 / $0
All-Time High
$0
All-Time Low
$0
1ART Supply
Circulating Supply
143.42M
Total Supply
465.83M
Max Supply
1.00Bn
Updated Jan 19, 2026 3:00 am
image
1ART
OneArt
$0.000252684718
$0.000003600015(+1.45%)
Mkt Cap $36,239.04
There's nothing here for now
Vitalik Buterin Calls for Rethinking DAO Design in Crypto Industry
Vitalik Buterin Calls for Rethinking DAO Design in Crypto Industry
According to ChainCatcher, Vitalik Buterin has expressed concerns that the current practices in the crypto industry regarding Decentralized Autonomous Organizations (DAOs) have deviated from their original vision. He suggests a need to rethink and construct 'different and better DAO designs.' Buterin notes that Ethereum's initial concept was heavily inspired by DAOs, but they have now often been reduced to 'token-voting controlled vaults,' which, while operational in form, are inefficient, easily manipulated, and fail to address issues arising from human political games. Buterin emphasizes that DAOs remain an indispensable infrastructure with applications such as improving oracle design, enabling on-chain dispute arbitration, maintaining various critical lists, quickly launching short-term collaborative projects, and supporting long-term project maintenance after the original team exits. He believes the current issues lie not in participant motivation but in the inadequacies of governance and oracle system designs. In terms of governance frameworks, Buterin introduces the analysis perspective of 'concavity and convexity problems,' suggesting that different types of issues require different governance structures. Scenarios favoring consensus and robustness should emphasize broad participation and resistance to manipulation, while those requiring decisive action should allow for leadership, balanced by decentralized mechanisms. Buterin further points out that for DAOs to truly function, they must address the challenges of privacy and decision fatigue. This can be alleviated through privacy technologies like zero-knowledge proofs (ZK) and multi-party computation, as well as AI and consensus-based communication tools to ease governance burdens. He stresses that AI should not replace human judgment but serve as a tool to amplify and assist human intentions. Finally, Buterin states that future DAO designs need to consider governance mechanisms, privacy technologies, and communication layers as core components rather than auxiliary modules, ensuring that the decentralization and robustness of Ethereum's underlying infrastructure are maintained in its upper-layer applications.
Jan 19, 2026 3:13 pm
Vitalik Buterin: We need more and better DAOs, not just vaults controlled by token voting.
Vitalik Buterin: We need more and better DAOs, not just vaults controlled by token voting.
In an article, Vitalik Buterin stated that the current practice of DAOs in the crypto industry has deviated from the original vision, necessitating a rethinking and construction of "different and better DAO designs." Vitalik pointed out that Ethereum's initial concept was heavily inspired by decentralized autonomous organizations (DAOs), but today DAOs are often simplified into "treasuries controlled by token voting," which, while functional in form, are inefficient, easily manipulated, and fail to truly alleviate the problems arising from human political games. Vitalik emphasized that DAOs remain indispensable infrastructure, with applications including: improving oracle design, implementing on-chain dispute arbitration, maintaining various key lists, quickly launching short-term collaborative projects, and supporting long-term project maintenance after the original team leaves. He believes the current problem lies not in participant motivation, but in the inadequacies of the system design itself, including governance and oracles. Regarding governance frameworks, Vitalik introduced the analytical perspective of the "concave vs. convex problem," arguing that different types of problems require different governance structures: scenarios leaning towards consensus and robustness should emphasize broad participation and resistance to manipulation; while scenarios requiring decisive decision-making should allow for leadership, while being checked and balanced through decentralized mechanisms. Vitalik further pointed out that for DAOs to truly function, they must address the two major challenges of privacy and decision fatigue, and can alleviate the governance burden by leveraging privacy technologies such as zero-knowledge proofs (ZK) and multi-party computation, as well as AI and consensus-based communication tools. He emphasized that AI should not replace human judgment, but rather serve as a tool to amplify and assist human intentions. Finally, Vitalik stated that future DAO designs need to consider governance mechanisms, privacy technologies, and communication layers as core components, not subordinate modules, to ensure that the decentralized and robust performance of the Ethereum underlying layer is continued in its upper-layer applications.
Jan 19, 2026 3:04 pm

Frequently Asked Questions

  • What is the all-time high price of OneArt (1ART)?

    The all-time high of 1ART was 0 USD on 1970-01-01, from which the coin is now down 0%. The all-time high price of OneArt (1ART) is 0. The current price of 1ART is down 0% from its all-time high.

    Read More
  • How much OneArt (1ART) is there in circulation?

    As of , there is currently 143.42M 1ART in circulation. 1ART has a maximum supply of 1.00Bn.

    Read More
  • What is the market cap of OneArt (1ART)?

    The current market cap of 1ART is 36,239.04. It is calculated by multiplying the current supply of 1ART by its real-time market price of 0.000252684718.

    Read More
  • What is the all-time low price of OneArt (1ART)?

    The all-time low of 1ART was 0 , from which the coin is now up 0%. The all-time low price of OneArt (1ART) is 0. The current price of 1ART is up 0% from its all-time low.

    Read More
  • Is OneArt (1ART) a good investment?

    OneArt (1ART) has a market capitalization of $36,239.04 and is ranked #3494 on CoinMarketCap. The cryptocurrency market can be highly volatile, so be sure to do your own research (DYOR) and assess your risk tolerance. Additionally, analyze OneArt (1ART) price trends and patterns to find the best time to purchase 1ART.

    Read More